Understanding the Importance of Nutritional Status in Cancer Patients

Oct 13, 2025 by windailys.com 10 views

The Relationship Between Subjective Global Assessment, Quality of Life, and Phase Angle in Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients

Understanding the Importance of Nutritional Status in Cancer Patients

Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) is a widely used method to evaluate nutritional status in cancer patients. This assessment method is subjective, simple, inexpensive, and effective in evaluating the nutritional status of patients. Cancer patients often face malnutrition problems due to various factors, such as the location of tumors, stages of disease development, and symptoms like pain, vomiting, and constipation. Malnutrition has a significant impact on the quality of life of patients, making it an independent factor that can worsen their conditions. Malnutrition is a significant concern in cancer patients, and it is essential to evaluate their nutritional status to improve their quality of life.

In an effort to assess the nutritional status of cancer patients, Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) can be used as a non-invasive and reproducible technique. Through this method, changes in body composition and nutritional status can be easily evaluated. One important indicator measured in BIA is the angle phase, which reflects the relative contribution between the liquid (resistance) and the cell membrane (reactance) in the human body. Phase Angle is considered an indicator of body cell mass and nutritional status, providing a further picture of one's health.

Research Purpose and Methodology

This study aims to evaluate the relationship between SGA, quality of life, and phase angle as an indicator of nutritional status in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients. In this study, the analysis was carried out on 27 patients who had undergone a nutritional status assessment using SGA. The quality of life was measured through the SF-36 form, while the phase angle measurement was carried out using BIA. The study aimed to investigate the relationship between SGA, quality of life, and phase angle in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients, highlighting the importance of nutritional status in cancer treatment.

Methods and Results

The results showed a significant difference in the phase angle value based on the patient's nutritional status (p <0.05). Through the LSD multiple comparison test, it was found that there was a significant difference between severe malnutrition groups and moderate malnutrition, as well as severe malnutrition with good nutrition (p <0.05). However, there is no significant difference between moderate malnutrition groups and good nutrition (P> 0.05). The results highlighted the importance of phase angle as an indicator of nutritional status in cancer patients.

Furthermore, analysis of the physical health dimension in quality of life also shows significant differences based on nutritional status (p <0.05). LSD multiple comparative tests show that differences occur between severe malnutrition groups and moderate malnutrition and severe malnutrition with good nutrition (p <0.05). Meanwhile, there is no significant difference between moderate malnutrition and good nutrition (P> 0.05). The results emphasized the significant impact of nutritional status on the physical health dimension of quality of life in cancer patients.

However, in the mental health dimension of the quality of life, no significant differences are found based on nutritional status (P> 0.05). The results suggested that nutritional status may not have a significant impact on the mental health dimension of quality of life in cancer patients.

Additional Analysis and Explanation

The findings of this study highlighted the importance of evaluating nutritional status through the SGA method, especially in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients who were at high risk of experiencing malnutrition. This not only contributes to understanding of how nutritional status affects the quality of life of the patient, but also shows how phase angle can be a useful indicator in assessing cellular health and overall nutritional status. The study emphasized the importance of nutritional evaluation in cancer treatment, highlighting the need for a more aggressive prevention and intervention approach to malnutrition in cancer patients.

The quality of life, especially in physical dimensions, is strongly influenced by nutritional status. Patients with severe malnutrition tend to experience a more significant decline in physical health than those who have good nutritional status. Therefore, a more aggressive prevention and intervention approach to malnutrition in cancer patients needs to be applied to improve their quality of life. The study suggested that nutritional status plays a crucial role in improving the quality of life of cancer patients, particularly in the physical dimension.

In this context, it is essential for medical personnel to not only focus on the treatment of cancer but also pay attention to aspects of nutrition and the quality of life of patients as a whole. Thus, patients are expected to feel an increase in their quality of life, which is the ultimate goal of cancer treatment. The study emphasized the importance of a holistic approach to cancer treatment, incorporating nutritional evaluation and quality of life assessment.

Conclusion

Overall, this study provides important insights about the relationship between SGA, quality of life, and phase angle in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients. With an emphasis on nutritional status as a key factor in the quality of life of patients, this study underlines the importance of appropriate nutritional evaluation in cancer treatment. Efforts to improve careful nutritional status and monitoring can contribute significantly in improving the health and quality of life of cancer patients. The study concluded that nutritional evaluation is essential in cancer treatment, highlighting the need for a more aggressive prevention and intervention approach to malnutrition in cancer patients.

Keywords: Subjective Global Assessment, Quality of Life, Phase Angle, Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients, Nutritional Status, Cancer Treatment.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About the Relationship Between Subjective Global Assessment, Quality of Life, and Phase Angle in Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients

Q: What is Subjective Global Assessment (SGA)?

A: Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) is a widely used method to evaluate nutritional status in cancer patients. It is a subjective, simple, inexpensive, and effective approach to assess the nutritional status of patients.

Q: Why is nutritional status important in cancer patients?

A: Malnutrition is a significant concern in cancer patients, and it can have a significant impact on their quality of life. Malnutrition can worsen the conditions of cancer patients, making it essential to evaluate their nutritional status.

Q: What is Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA)?

A: Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) is a non-invasive and reproducible technique used to assess the nutritional status of patients. It measures the angle phase, which reflects the relative contribution between the liquid (resistance) and the cell membrane (reactance) in the human body.

Q: What is the significance of phase angle in BIA?

A: Phase angle is considered an indicator of body cell mass and nutritional status, providing a further picture of one's health. It is an essential indicator in assessing cellular health and overall nutritional status.

Q: What is the relationship between SGA, quality of life, and phase angle in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients?

A: The study found a significant relationship between SGA, quality of life, and phase angle in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients. The results showed that patients with severe malnutrition tend to experience a more significant decline in physical health than those who have good nutritional status.

Q: How does nutritional status affect the quality of life of cancer patients?

A: Nutritional status plays a crucial role in improving the quality of life of cancer patients, particularly in the physical dimension. Patients with good nutritional status tend to experience a better quality of life compared to those with severe malnutrition.

Q: What is the importance of nutritional evaluation in cancer treatment?

A: Nutritional evaluation is essential in cancer treatment, highlighting the need for a more aggressive prevention and intervention approach to malnutrition in cancer patients. Efforts to improve careful nutritional status and monitoring can contribute significantly in improving the health and quality of life of cancer patients.

Q: What are the implications of this study for cancer treatment?

A: The study emphasizes the importance of a holistic approach to cancer treatment, incorporating nutritional evaluation and quality of life assessment. It highlights the need for medical personnel to not only focus on the treatment of cancer but also pay attention to aspects of nutrition and the quality of life of patients as a whole.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The study has several limitations, including the small sample size and the use of a single assessment tool to evaluate nutritional status. Future studies should aim to address these limitations and provide more comprehensive insights into the relationship between SGA, quality of life, and phase angle in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients.

Q: What are the future directions for research in this area?

A: Future research should aim to investigate the relationship between SGA, quality of life, and phase angle in a larger sample size and using multiple assessment tools to evaluate nutritional status. Additionally, studies should aim to explore the impact of nutritional intervention on the quality of life of cancer patients.

Keywords: Subjective Global Assessment, Quality of Life, Phase Angle, Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients, Nutritional Status, Cancer Treatment.