The Prevalence of Types of Capitis Trauma Bleeding with the Death of Adam Malik Hajj Hospital Patients in 2012

Oct 13, 2025 by windailys.com 63 views

The Prevalence of Types of Capitis Trauma Bleeding with the Death of Adam Malik Hajj Hospital Patients in 2012

Introduction

Head trauma is a serious concern worldwide, including in Indonesia. The Adam Malik Hajj Hospital has conducted research to determine the prevalence of types of capitis trauma bleeding that caused patient death in 2012. This study aims to provide a clearer picture of the factors contributing to death due to head trauma.

Background

Head trauma is a significant public health concern globally. In the United States, it is reported that around 1.7 million cases of head trauma occur every year, with 52,000 of them ending in death. Meanwhile, data from the National Trauma Project in the Islamic Republic of Iran shows that head trauma covers 78.7% of all types of trauma reported, making it the main cause of death. This highlights the urgency to understand the prevalence and the most dangerous type of bleeding from capitis trauma in hospitals, especially at Adam Malik Hajj Hospital.

Research Purposes

The primary purpose of this study was to determine the most common types of capitis trauma bleeding that caused the death of patients in the inpatient room of the Adam Malik Hajj Hospital in 2012.

Methodology

This study employed a descriptive method with a cross-sectional design. A total of 26 samples were taken using the total sampling technique, with predetermined inclusion criteria. This ensures that the data obtained is relevant and representative.

Research Results

Of the 26 samples studied, it was found that mortality was more experienced by male patients, as many as 21 people (80.8%). The highest mortality occurs in patients with a moderate Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, which is 12 people (46.2%). The most common type of intracranial hemorrhage causes death is subdural bleeding, recorded as many as 7 people (26.9%). In addition, the majority of patients who experience capitis trauma bleeding are within the age range of 0-25 years, which is 12 people (46.2%).

Discussion

The results showed that subdural bleeding was the main cause of death among patients with capitis trauma, covering 26.9% of the total cases. Patients with GCS are contributing to a mortality rate of 46.2%, showing that lower levels of consciousness are directly related to increased risk of mortality. In addition, the age range of 0-25 years also shows a high prevalence in death due to head trauma, which indicates the importance of precise preventive and treatment actions among these age groups.

Conclusion

From this study, it can be concluded that subdural bleeding is the most risky type of capitis trauma bleeding causing death, with male patients and young age groups as the most vulnerable groups. Understanding this profile is important for hospitals and medical personnel in designing better handling strategies and prevention programs to reduce death rates due to future head trauma. Further research is needed to explore the factors that contribute to mortality and find more effective solutions.

Implications for Future Research

This study highlights the need for further research to explore the factors that contribute to mortality due to head trauma. Understanding the underlying causes of mortality will enable the development of more effective prevention and treatment strategies. Additionally, this study emphasizes the importance of precise preventive and treatment actions among young age groups, who are most vulnerable to death due to head trauma.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations. The sample size is relatively small, and the study was conducted in a single hospital. Further research is needed to confirm the findings of this study and to explore the generalizability of the results to other hospitals and populations.

Recommendations for Practice

Based on the findings of this study, hospitals and medical personnel should prioritize the prevention and treatment of head trauma, particularly among young age groups. This can be achieved through the implementation of evidence-based prevention and treatment strategies, such as the use of helmets and other protective gear, and the provision of timely and effective medical care.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the prevalence of types of capitis trauma bleeding that caused patient death at the Adam Malik Hajj Hospital in 2012. The findings highlight the importance of understanding the factors contributing to mortality due to head trauma and the need for further research to explore the underlying causes of mortality. By prioritizing the prevention and treatment of head trauma, hospitals and medical personnel can reduce death rates and improve patient outcomes.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the Prevalence of Types of Capitis Trauma Bleeding with the Death of Adam Malik Hajj Hospital Patients in 2012

Q: What is capitis trauma bleeding?

A: Capitis trauma bleeding refers to bleeding in the brain caused by head trauma. It is a serious medical condition that can lead to death if not treated promptly and effectively.

Q: What is the purpose of this study?

A: The purpose of this study was to determine the most common types of capitis trauma bleeding that caused the death of patients in the inpatient room of the Adam Malik Hajj Hospital in 2012.

Q: What were the research methods used in this study?

A: This study employed a descriptive method with a cross-sectional design. A total of 26 samples were taken using the total sampling technique, with predetermined inclusion criteria.

Q: What were the findings of this study?

A: The study found that mortality was more experienced by male patients, as many as 21 people (80.8%). The highest mortality occurs in patients with a moderate Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, which is 12 people (46.2%). The most common type of intracranial hemorrhage causes death is subdural bleeding, recorded as many as 7 people (26.9%).

Q: What are the implications of this study?

A: The study highlights the importance of understanding the factors contributing to mortality due to head trauma and the need for further research to explore the underlying causes of mortality. By prioritizing the prevention and treatment of head trauma, hospitals and medical personnel can reduce death rates and improve patient outcomes.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: This study has several limitations. The sample size is relatively small, and the study was conducted in a single hospital. Further research is needed to confirm the findings of this study and to explore the generalizability of the results to other hospitals and populations.

Q: What are the recommendations for practice based on this study?

A: Based on the findings of this study, hospitals and medical personnel should prioritize the prevention and treatment of head trauma, particularly among young age groups. This can be achieved through the implementation of evidence-based prevention and treatment strategies, such as the use of helmets and other protective gear, and the provision of timely and effective medical care.

Q: What are the future research directions based on this study?

A: This study highlights the need for further research to explore the factors that contribute to mortality due to head trauma. Understanding the underlying causes of mortality will enable the development of more effective prevention and treatment strategies.

Q: What are the potential applications of this study?

A: The findings of this study can be applied to improve the prevention and treatment of head trauma in hospitals and medical settings. By prioritizing the prevention and treatment of head trauma, hospitals and medical personnel can reduce death rates and improve patient outcomes.

Q: What are the potential implications for public health policy?

A: The study highlights the importance of prioritizing the prevention and treatment of head trauma in public health policy. By implementing evidence-based prevention and treatment strategies, public health policymakers can reduce death rates and improve patient outcomes.

Q: What are the potential implications for healthcare providers?

A: The study highlights the importance of prioritizing the prevention and treatment of head trauma in healthcare provider practice. By implementing evidence-based prevention and treatment strategies, healthcare providers can reduce death rates and improve patient outcomes.

Conclusion