Organizational Consolidation

Oct 13, 2025 by windailys.com 55 views

Analysis of the Factors that Influence the Delay in the Recapitulation of Vote Counting in Deli Serdang Regency in the 2019 Election

Introduction

The 2019 General Election in Deli Serdang Regency, North Sumatra, was marked by a unique note - the delay in the recapitulation of vote counting, particularly at the level of the District Election Committee (PPK). In fact, Percut Sei Tuan District became the last region in Indonesia to complete the recapitulation process. This study aims to reveal the factors that contributed to this delay using the theory of election integrity, workload theory, and competency theory.

Theoretical Background

Election integrity refers to the ability of the election process to produce a fair and accurate outcome. Workload theory suggests that the amount of work assigned to election organizers can impact their performance. Competency theory, on the other hand, emphasizes the importance of election organizers having the necessary skills and knowledge to carry out their tasks effectively.

Methodology

This study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining both qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods. The research was conducted in Deli Serdang Regency, North Sumatra, and involved a survey of election organizers, as well as in-depth interviews with key stakeholders.

Findings

The study found that the integrity and workload variables had a potential impact on the late recapitulation of vote count, with a combined effect of 35.8%. However, the competency variable turned out to have a more dominant influence than the other two variables. This suggests that the delay in the recapitulation of votes in Deli Serdang was not solely due to the low integrity of the election organizer or high workload, but also due to a lack of competence in carrying out tasks.

Factors Contributing to the Delay

In addition to the three main variables, the study identified several other factors that contributed to the delay in the recapitulation of votes:

Election Regulations

Less flexible regulations and a failure to adjust to conditions in each region can be an inhibiting factor in the recapitulation process. The current regulations do not take into account the unique challenges faced by each region, leading to delays and inefficiencies.

Organizational Consolidation

Delay in the process of consolidating the organization of the election organizer can also be an inhibiting factor. This can lead to confusion and inefficiencies, ultimately delaying the recapitulation process.

Election Malpractice

Election malpractice cases, such as data inputting or vote manipulation, can slow down the recapitulation process. These cases can lead to disputes and delays, ultimately affecting the accuracy and fairness of the election outcome.

Election Budget

Inadequate budget availability can result in delays in the procurement of logistics and payroll of officers. This can lead to a lack of resources and personnel, ultimately impacting the efficiency and effectiveness of the election process.

Facilities and Infrastructure

Lack of adequate facilities and infrastructure, such as a stable internet network, can hamper the recapitulation process. This can lead to delays and inefficiencies, ultimately affecting the accuracy and fairness of the election outcome.

Strategic Steps to Overcome the Problem

To overcome the problem of delayed recapitulation of votes, several strategic steps can be taken:

Improvement of Organizer Competencies

The process of recruiting ad hoc organizers needs to be improved with a focus on professional criteria, freedom from political interests, and high standards in the field of electoral. This can help ensure that election organizers have the necessary skills and knowledge to carry out their tasks effectively.

Focus on Integrity

It is essential to continue to maintain the integrity of the election organizer. This can be achieved through regular training and evaluation, as well as a strong commitment to upholding the principles of fairness and accuracy.

Workload Management

The workload of the election organizer needs to be managed properly so as not to become a burden that hinders performance. This can be achieved through effective planning and resource allocation, as well as regular monitoring and evaluation.

Regulatory Revision

Election regulations must be flexible and able to adjust to conditions in each region. This can help ensure that the election process is efficient and effective, and that the needs of each region are taken into account.

Commissioner Recruitment

The recruitment process of commissioners needs to be carried out by considering the ongoing election stages. This can help ensure that commissioners have the necessary skills and knowledge to carry out their tasks effectively.

Sustainable Solutions for the Budget

The fulfillment of the election budget must be planned carefully and continuously, both before and during the election process. This can help ensure that resources are available when needed, and that the election process is efficient and effective.

Provision of Facilities and Infrastructure

Improvement of facilities and infrastructure, especially stable internet access, is very important to support the performance of election organizers. This can help ensure that the election process is efficient and effective, and that the needs of each region are taken into account.

Conclusion

The late recapitulation of vote counting in Deli Serdang is a complex issue that requires serious attention from all parties. Comprehensive and continuous solutions are needed to improve the quality of elections in the future. By implementing the strategic steps outlined above, it is possible to overcome the problem of delayed recapitulation of votes and ensure that the election process is efficient, effective, and fair.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the Analysis of the Factors that Influence the Delay in the Recapitulation of Vote Counting in Deli Serdang Regency in the 2019 Election

Q: What was the main finding of the study?

A: The main finding of the study was that the competency variable had a more dominant influence on the delay in the recapitulation of votes in Deli Serdang Regency in the 2019 election, compared to the integrity and workload variables.

Q: What are the factors that contributed to the delay in the recapitulation of votes?

A: The study identified several factors that contributed to the delay in the recapitulation of votes, including:

Election regulations that are less flexible and do not adjust to conditions in each region
Delay in the process of consolidating the organization of the election organizer
Election malpractice cases, such as data inputting or vote manipulation
Inadequate budget availability
Lack of adequate facilities and infrastructure, such as a stable internet network

Q: What are the strategic steps to overcome the problem of delayed recapitulation of votes?

A: The study suggested several strategic steps to overcome the problem of delayed recapitulation of votes, including:

Improvement of organizer competencies through professional criteria, freedom from political interests, and high standards in the field of electoral
Focus on integrity through regular training and evaluation, and a strong commitment to upholding the principles of fairness and accuracy
Workload management through effective planning and resource allocation, and regular monitoring and evaluation
Regulatory revision to make election regulations more flexible and able to adjust to conditions in each region
Commissioner recruitment that considers the ongoing election stages
Sustainable solutions for the budget through careful and continuous planning
Provision of facilities and infrastructure, especially stable internet access

Q: What are the implications of the study for the future of elections in Indonesia?

A: The study has several implications for the future of elections in Indonesia, including:

The need for comprehensive and continuous solutions to improve the quality of elections
The importance of maintaining the integrity of the election organizer
The need for effective workload management and resource allocation
The importance of regulatory revision to make election regulations more flexible and able to adjust to conditions in each region
The need for sustainable solutions for the budget and provision of facilities and infrastructure

Q: What are the limitations of the study?

A: The study has several limitations, including:

The study was conducted in a single region, Deli Serdang Regency, and may not be generalizable to other regions in Indonesia
The study relied on a survey of election organizers and in-depth interviews with key stakeholders, which may not be representative of all stakeholders involved in the election process
The study did not examine the impact of external factors, such as social and economic conditions, on the delay in the recapitulation of votes.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: The study suggests several future research directions, including:

Conducting a similar study in other regions in Indonesia to examine the generalizability of the findings
Examining the impact of external factors, such as social and economic conditions, on the delay in the recapitulation of votes
Investigating the effectiveness of the strategic steps suggested in the study in overcoming the problem of delayed recapitulation of votes.