Jakarta Election 2017: Round 1 & 2 Results

by Jhon Lennon 43 views

The 2017 Jakarta gubernatorial election was a hotly contested affair, guys, and everyone was super curious about the hasil pilkada DKI 2017 putaran pertama dan kedua. It wasn't just about who would be the next governor; it was a reflection of the political climate and the diverse opinions within Jakarta's population. The election was held to determine the Governor and Vice Governor of Jakarta for the term 2017–2022. Because no candidate pairs managed to secure more than 50% of the votes in the first round, a second round was necessary. Let's dive into what happened in both rounds and what made this election so significant.

First Round Showdown

The first round of the election took place on February 15, 2017. Three candidate pairs were in the running:

  • Basuki Tjahaja Purnama (Ahok) and Djarot Saiful Hidayat
  • Anies Baswedan and Sandiaga Uno
  • Agus Harimurti Yudhoyono and Sylviana Murni

Ahok and Djarot, the incumbent pair, were seen as the frontrunners, backed by a coalition of major political parties. They campaigned on their track record of improving public services and infrastructure in Jakarta. Their campaign focused on continuing the programs they had already started, such as the Jakarta Smart City initiative, flood mitigation projects, and improvements to public transportation. Ahok's no-nonsense approach and his commitment to fighting corruption resonated with many Jakartans who were tired of the old ways of doing things. However, his strong personality also made him a controversial figure, and he faced significant opposition from certain segments of society.

Anies Baswedan and Sandiaga Uno presented themselves as an alternative, promising a more inclusive and collaborative approach to governance. Their campaign highlighted issues such as social inequality and the need for economic opportunities for all Jakartans. They also focused on improving education and healthcare services. Anies, with his background in academia and public policy, appealed to voters who wanted a more intellectual and thoughtful leader. Sandiaga, a successful businessman, brought his entrepreneurial skills and promised to create jobs and boost the economy. Their campaign strategy involved reaching out to various community groups and listening to their concerns, which helped them gain support from a wide range of voters.

Agus Harimurti Yudhoyono and Sylviana Murni ran on a platform of change, offering a fresh perspective and a focus on youth empowerment. Agus, the son of former President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, brought a youthful energy to the race. His military background and education in public policy gave him a unique perspective on governance. Sylviana, a seasoned civil servant, provided valuable experience and insights into the workings of the Jakarta administration. Their campaign emphasized the importance of security, stability, and economic growth. They also promised to improve social welfare programs and address issues such as traffic congestion and pollution.

The results of the first round were:

  • Ahok-Djarot: 42.99%
  • Anies-Sandiaga: 39.95%
  • Agus-Sylviana: 17.06%

As you can see, no pair secured the necessary 50% + 1 vote, which meant a second round was inevitable. Agus-Sylviana were eliminated, and the race narrowed down to Ahok-Djarot and Anies-Sandiaga.

Road to the Second Round

With Agus-Sylviana out, their supporters became a crucial target for both remaining camps. The period between the first and second rounds was marked by intense campaigning and political maneuvering. Both Ahok-Djarot and Anies-Sandiaga ramped up their efforts to win over voters, employing various strategies to gain an edge.

Ahok-Djarot continued to emphasize their track record and the progress they had made in Jakarta. They highlighted their achievements in improving public services, reducing corruption, and enhancing the city's infrastructure. They also sought to address concerns about Ahok's controversial statements and to reassure voters that they were committed to serving all residents of Jakarta, regardless of their background. Their campaign focused on reminding voters of the tangible improvements they had seen under Ahok's leadership and the potential for further progress if they were given another term.

Anies-Sandiaga intensified their efforts to present themselves as the best alternative for Jakarta. They focused on issues such as social justice, economic inequality, and the need for a more inclusive government. They also sought to capitalize on the controversies surrounding Ahok and to portray themselves as a unifying force that could bring Jakarta together. Their campaign involved reaching out to various community groups and religious leaders, seeking their support and endorsement. They promised to listen to the concerns of all Jakartans and to create policies that would benefit everyone, not just a select few.

The political atmosphere became increasingly charged, with debates and discussions often revolving around sensitive issues of identity and religion. Social media played a significant role in shaping public opinion, with various narratives and counter-narratives circulating online. The election became a battleground for different ideologies and visions for the future of Jakarta.

Second Round Results: The Decisive Moment

The second round took place on April 19, 2017. The hasil pilkada DKI 2017 putaran kedua were highly anticipated, with both sides feeling the pressure. The results were:

  • Anies Baswedan and Sandiaga Uno: 57.96%
  • Basuki Tjahaja Purnama (Ahok) and Djarot Saiful Hidayat: 42.04%

Anies and Sandiaga emerged victorious, marking a significant shift in Jakarta's political landscape. Their victory was attributed to a combination of factors, including their effective campaign strategy, their ability to connect with a broad range of voters, and the controversies surrounding Ahok. They successfully mobilized support from various community groups and religious organizations, creating a strong coalition that propelled them to victory. Their message of inclusivity and social justice resonated with many Jakartans who felt marginalized or left behind by the previous administration.

Ahok and Djarot, despite their efforts, were unable to overcome the challenges they faced. While they maintained a strong base of support, they were unable to win over enough new voters to secure a victory. The controversies surrounding Ahok, including allegations of blasphemy, played a significant role in shaping public opinion and mobilizing opposition against him. Despite their efforts to address these concerns and to reassure voters of their commitment to serving all residents of Jakarta, they were unable to shake off the negative perceptions that had taken hold.

Implications and Aftermath

The hasil pilkada DKI 2017 putaran pertama dan kedua had significant implications for Jakarta and Indonesian politics as a whole. Anies Baswedan's victory marked a turning point, signaling a shift in the political landscape and highlighting the importance of identity politics. The election also underscored the power of social media in shaping public opinion and influencing electoral outcomes.

Anies's victory also reflected the deep divisions within Jakarta's society. The election exposed fault lines related to religion, ethnicity, and socio-economic status. These divisions continued to be a challenge for Anies's administration as he sought to govern a diverse and complex city. He had to navigate competing interests and to build consensus among various groups in order to implement his policies effectively.

The election also had broader implications for Indonesian politics. It served as a reminder of the importance of addressing issues of inequality and social justice. It also highlighted the need for political leaders to be sensitive to the concerns of all segments of society and to promote inclusivity and tolerance. The election sparked debates about the role of religion in politics and the importance of upholding democratic values.

In the aftermath of the election, Ahok was embroiled in a legal battle over allegations of blasphemy. He was eventually convicted and sentenced to two years in prison, a decision that sparked widespread protests and raised concerns about the state of religious freedom in Indonesia. The case became a symbol of the challenges facing Indonesia's democracy and the need to protect the rights of all citizens, regardless of their religious beliefs.

Conclusion

The Jakarta Election of 2017 was a pivotal moment in Indonesian politics. The hasil pilkada DKI 2017 putaran pertama dan kedua reflected the complex dynamics of Jakarta's society and the broader political landscape of Indonesia. The election was not just about choosing a governor; it was about shaping the future of Jakarta and setting a precedent for Indonesian democracy. The results highlighted the importance of understanding local dynamics and the impact of national issues on regional elections. It served as a reminder of the importance of civic engagement and the power of the people to shape their own destiny. The election also underscored the need for political leaders to be responsive to the needs of their constituents and to uphold the values of democracy, justice, and equality.

So, there you have it, a recap of the Jakarta Election 2017. It was a wild ride, guys, full of twists, turns, and plenty of political drama! Understanding the hasil pilkada DKI 2017 putaran pertama dan kedua gives us a peek into the ever-changing world of Indonesian politics.