Imprin cytology can be used as a reliable method for intraoperative diagnosis

Oct 13, 2025 by windailys.com 19 views

Diagnostic Accuracy of Imprin and Frozen Section Cytology Compared to Histopathology at the Adam Malik Hajj Center for Medan in 2018

Background

Intraoperative consultation is a crucial part of the practice of pathologists, providing vital information directly to surgeons during surgery. Two common methods used in this consultation are Frozen Section (FS) and Imprin cytology. Although Frozen Section shows higher accuracy in terms of sensitivity and specificity compared to Imprin cytology, the use of FS requires special equipment, making it more expensive. Therefore, Imprin cytology is expected to be a useful alternative, especially in regional hospitals with limited health facilities. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of these two methods at the Central General Hospital (RSUP) Haji Adam Malik Medan as part of a hospital reaccreditation assessment.

The Importance of Intraoperative Consultation

Intraoperative consultation is a critical aspect of surgical practice, enabling pathologists to provide immediate feedback to surgeons during surgery. This consultation helps surgeons to make informed decisions about the extent of the surgery, the need for additional procedures, and the potential risks and complications associated with the surgery. The accuracy of intraoperative consultation is, therefore, crucial in ensuring the best possible outcomes for patients.

Research Purposes

This study aims to assess the ratio of Imprin and Frozen Section cytology accuracy as an intraoperative procedure for histopathological examination at Adam Malik Hajj Hospital in Medan in 2018. The study aims to evaluate the accuracy of these two methods in diagnosing various types of neoplastic lesions, including thyroid, breast, urinary tract, neck, head, and skin lesions.

Materials and Methods

This study is a type of diagnostic test, with samples taken from all patients with neoplastic lesions in thyroid organs, breasts, urinary tract, neck, head, and skin. The sample has undergone an Imprin, Frozen Section, and Histopathology cytology examination, by meeting the established inclusion criteria. The study included a total of 79 samples, with 13 samples from men (16.5%) and 66 samples from women (83.5%), with an average age of respondents reaching 47.8 ± 13.9 years.

Research Results

The results of the study showed that the level of Imprin cytological accuracy to histopathology was recorded at 92.4%, with a sensitivity of 90.3% and 100% specificity. Conversely, the accuracy of the Frozen Section to histopathology is 96.2%, with a sensitivity of 95.2% and 100% specificity. The suitability test results between the Imprin cytology and the frozen section showed a p-value of 0.250 (p > 0.05), which showed no significant difference between the two methods.

Additional Analysis and Explanation

In the context of a pathological examination, both Imprin cytology and frozen section have advantages and disadvantages of each. Frozen Section, although more accurate, has limitations in terms of costs and equipment needs that may not be available in all health facilities. Meanwhile, Imprin cytology offers a more economical and more accessible solution in hospitals with limited facilities. The results of this study indicate that although Frozen Section has a slight advantage in accuracy, Imprin cytology remains a reliable method for intraoperative diagnosis.

The Role of Imprin Cytology in Intraoperative Diagnosis

Imprin cytology has emerged as a reliable method for intraoperative diagnosis, particularly in areas with limited resources. The high sensitivity and specificity of Imprin cytology make it an attractive alternative to Frozen Section, especially in regional hospitals with limited health facilities. The findings of this study provide important evidence for the development of pathological practices in Indonesia, especially in improving health services in regional hospitals.

Conclusion

Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that there is no significant difference between the results of the Imprin and Frozen Section cytology examination compared to histopathology. This study provides evidence that the two methods have a fairly good accuracy, and Imprin cytology can be a valid alternative in diagnostic practices, especially in more limited health facilities. The findings of this study have important implications for the development of pathological practices in Indonesia, particularly in improving health services in regional hospitals.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

Imprin cytology can be used as a reliable method for intraoperative diagnosis, particularly in areas with limited resources.
Frozen Section can be used as a reference method for histopathological examination, especially in cases where Imprin cytology is not available.
Further studies are needed to evaluate the accuracy of Imprin cytology in other types of neoplastic lesions, including other organs and tissues.
The development of pathological practices in Indonesia should prioritize the use of Imprin cytology, especially in regional hospitals with limited health facilities.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations, including:

The sample size was relatively small, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.
The study was conducted in a single hospital, which may not be representative of other hospitals in Indonesia.
The study did not evaluate the accuracy of Imprin cytology in other types of neoplastic lesions, which may limit the applicability of the findings.

Future Directions

Future studies should aim to evaluate the accuracy of Imprin cytology in other types of neoplastic lesions, including other organs and tissues. Additionally, further studies are needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Imprin cytology compared to Frozen Section. The development of pathological practices in Indonesia should prioritize the use of Imprin cytology, especially in regional hospitals with limited health facilities.
Q&A: Diagnostic Accuracy of Imprin and Frozen Section Cytology Compared to Histopathology at the Adam Malik Hajj Center for Medan in 2018

Frequently Asked Questions

We have received several questions from readers regarding the diagnostic accuracy of Imprin and Frozen Section cytology compared to histopathology at the Adam Malik Hajj Center for Medan in 2018. Below are some of the most frequently asked questions and their answers.

Q1: What is the main objective of this study?

A1: The main objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of Imprin and Frozen Section cytology compared to histopathology in diagnosing various types of neoplastic lesions.

Q2: What are the advantages and disadvantages of Imprin cytology compared to Frozen Section?

A2: Imprin cytology has several advantages, including being more economical and more accessible in hospitals with limited facilities. However, it has some limitations, including lower accuracy compared to Frozen Section.

Q3: What are the results of the study in terms of accuracy?

A3: The results of the study showed that the level of Imprin cytological accuracy to histopathology was recorded at 92.4%, with a sensitivity of 90.3% and 100% specificity. Conversely, the accuracy of the Frozen Section to histopathology is 96.2%, with a sensitivity of 95.2% and 100% specificity.

Q4: Is there a significant difference between the results of Imprin and Frozen Section cytology examination compared to histopathology?

A4: No, there is no significant difference between the results of Imprin and Frozen Section cytology examination compared to histopathology.

Q5: What are the implications of this study for the development of pathological practices in Indonesia?

A5: The findings of this study have important implications for the development of pathological practices in Indonesia, particularly in improving health services in regional hospitals.

Q6: Can Imprin cytology be used as a reliable method for intraoperative diagnosis?

A6: Yes, Imprin cytology can be used as a reliable method for intraoperative diagnosis, particularly in areas with limited resources.

Q7: What are the limitations of this study?

A7: The study has several limitations, including a relatively small sample size and the study was conducted in a single hospital.

Q8: What are the future directions for this study?

A8: Future studies should aim to evaluate the accuracy of Imprin cytology in other types of neoplastic lesions, including other organs and tissues. Additionally, further studies are needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Imprin cytology compared to Frozen Section.

Q9: Can Frozen Section be used as a reference method for histopathological examination?

A9: Yes, Frozen Section can be used as a reference method for histopathological examination, especially in cases where Imprin cytology is not available.

Q10: What are the recommendations of this study?

A10: The recommendations of this study include the use of Imprin cytology as a reliable method for intraoperative diagnosis, particularly in areas with limited resources, and the use of Frozen Section as a reference method for histopathological examination.

Conclusion

We hope that this Q&A article has provided valuable information to readers regarding the diagnostic accuracy of Imprin and Frozen Section cytology compared to histopathology at the Adam Malik Hajj Center for Medan in 2018. If you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us.