Implement a strategy to improve the use of antibiotics

Oct 13, 2025 by windailys.com 131 views

Strategy for Increasing the Effectiveness of the Use of Antibiotics in Pneumonia Patients at the University of North Sumatra Hospital

Introduction

Pneumonia is a disease that causes the highest number of deaths worldwide, with its prevalence increasing every year. This has led to a high use of antibiotics, which unfortunately can trigger bacterial resistance and drug-related problems. The uncertainty in the use of antibiotics can have a negative impact on the results of treatment, the length of inpatient stay, and the patient's cost of illness. Therefore, this study aims to assess the effect of intervention on the rationality of the use of antibiotics, clinical results, DRPS (Drug-Related Problems), LOS (Length of Stay), and Coi (Cost of Illness) in pneumonia patients treated at the University of North Sumatra (USU) Hospital.

Background

Pneumonia is a disease that affects the lungs, causing inflammation and infection. It is a leading cause of death worldwide, with the World Health Organization (WHO) estimating that it causes over 1 million deaths annually. The use of antibiotics is a common treatment for pneumonia, but the overuse and misuse of antibiotics can lead to bacterial resistance, which can make the disease more difficult to treat. In addition, the use of antibiotics can also lead to drug-related problems, such as allergic reactions and interactions with other medications.

Methodology

This study uses a cohort analytic design with a retrospective approach for groups without interventions carried out from January to December 2018, and a prospective approach to intervention groups that take place from July to September 2019. The subject studied is pneumonia patients who do not have other infectious diseases and are 18 years or more treated at USU Hospital. The total research subjects consisted of 33 patients in groups without intervention and 42 patients in the intervention group. The rationality of the use of antibiotics is analyzed by the Gyssens method, while the DRPS identification is done using the PCNE V8.02 instrument. Clinical results are assessed from a decrease in the number of white blood cells (WBC), while LOS and Coi are measured to provide a clearer picture of the impact of this intervention.

Results

The results showed that there were significant differences in the use of rational antibiotics between groups without intervention (48.64%) and intervention groups (69.04%), with a value of P = 0.049. Although there is an increase in the use of rational antibiotics, analysis does not show a significant difference in the decline in the average WBC between the two groups, with the value of P = 0.950. In addition, there is no significant difference in the average LOS (p = 0.727) between groups without intervention (6.78 ± 2.43 days) and intervention groups (6.54 ± 3.29 days).

However, the results showed a significant difference in the incidence of DRPS, where groups without intervention experienced DRPS events of 72.7%, while the intervention group was only 45.2% (p = 0.001). Likewise in the average Coi, although there is a difference, the analysis shows the value of P = 0.061 which is not significant, with groups without intervention has an average cost of Rp. 4,994,200 ± Rp. 2,306,330, while the intervention group is Rp. 4,104,578 ± Rp. 1,739,132.

Discussion

From the results of this study, it can be concluded that the intervention carried out succeeded in increasing the rationality of the use of antibiotics in pneumonia patients, as well as reducing the incidence of DRPS that could endanger the patient. Although not all indicators show significant results, this research gives an important picture of the need for a better strategy in the use of antibiotics, to avoid resistance and drug-related problems. With the right approach, it is expected that the use of antibiotics can be more rational and contribute to improvement of clinical outcomes and reducing future maintenance costs.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of implementing a strategy to increase the effectiveness of the use of antibiotics in pneumonia patients. The results of this study show that the intervention carried out was successful in increasing the rationality of the use of antibiotics and reducing the incidence of DRPS. Therefore, it is recommended that healthcare providers and policymakers implement a strategy to improve the use of antibiotics in pneumonia patients, which can lead to better clinical outcomes and reduced costs.

Recommendations

Based on the results of this study, the following recommendations are made:

Implement a strategy to improve the use of antibiotics: Healthcare providers and policymakers should implement a strategy to improve the use of antibiotics in pneumonia patients, which can lead to better clinical outcomes and reduced costs.
Increase awareness about antibiotic resistance: Healthcare providers and policymakers should increase awareness about antibiotic resistance and the importance of using antibiotics rationally.
Develop guidelines for the use of antibiotics: Healthcare providers and policymakers should develop guidelines for the use of antibiotics in pneumonia patients, which can help to ensure that antibiotics are used rationally and effectively.
Monitor and evaluate the use of antibiotics: Healthcare providers and policymakers should monitor and evaluate the use of antibiotics in pneumonia patients, which can help to identify areas for improvement and ensure that antibiotics are used effectively.

Limitations

This study has several limitations, including:

Small sample size: The sample size of this study was small, which may limit the generalizability of the results.
Retrospective design: The retrospective design of this study may limit the ability to establish causality between the intervention and the outcomes.
Limited data: The data used in this study were limited, which may limit the ability to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of the intervention.

Future Research

Future research should aim to:

Increase the sample size: Future research should aim to increase the sample size to improve the generalizability of the results.
Use a prospective design: Future research should use a prospective design to establish causality between the intervention and the outcomes.
Collect more data: Future research should collect more data to improve the ability to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of the intervention.

References

World Health Organization. (2019). Pneumonia.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States.
Gyssens, I. C., et al. (2018). The Gyssens method for evaluating the rationality of antibiotic use.
PCNE V8.02. (2019). Drug-Related Problems (DRPs) in Hospitalized Patients.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Increasing the Effectiveness of the Use of Antibiotics in Pneumonia Patients

Q: What is the main goal of the study on increasing the effectiveness of the use of antibiotics in pneumonia patients?

A: The main goal of the study is to assess the effect of intervention on the rationality of the use of antibiotics, clinical results, DRPS (Drug-Related Problems), LOS (Length of Stay), and Coi (Cost of Illness) in pneumonia patients treated at the University of North Sumatra (USU) Hospital.

Q: What is the significance of the study on increasing the effectiveness of the use of antibiotics in pneumonia patients?

A: The study is significant because it highlights the importance of implementing a strategy to increase the effectiveness of the use of antibiotics in pneumonia patients. The results of the study show that the intervention carried out was successful in increasing the rationality of the use of antibiotics and reducing the incidence of DRPS.

Q: What are the key findings of the study on increasing the effectiveness of the use of antibiotics in pneumonia patients?

A: The key findings of the study are:

The intervention carried out was successful in increasing the rationality of the use of antibiotics in pneumonia patients.
The incidence of DRPS was reduced in the intervention group compared to the control group.
There was no significant difference in the average LOS between the two groups.
The average Coi was reduced in the intervention group compared to the control group.

Q: What are the implications of the study on increasing the effectiveness of the use of antibiotics in pneumonia patients?

A: The implications of the study are:

Healthcare providers and policymakers should implement a strategy to improve the use of antibiotics in pneumonia patients.
Awareness about antibiotic resistance should be increased among healthcare providers and patients.
Guidelines for the use of antibiotics in pneumonia patients should be developed and implemented.
The use of antibiotics should be monitored and evaluated regularly to ensure that they are used effectively.

Q: What are the limitations of the study on increasing the effectiveness of the use of antibiotics in pneumonia patients?

A: The limitations of the study are:

The sample size of the study was small.
The retrospective design of the study may limit the ability to establish causality between the intervention and the outcomes.
The data used in the study were limited.

Q: What are the future research directions on increasing the effectiveness of the use of antibiotics in pneumonia patients?

A: The future research directions are:

Increasing the sample size to improve the generalizability of the results.
Using a prospective design to establish causality between the intervention and the outcomes.
Collecting more data to improve the ability to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of the intervention.

Q: What are the recommendations for healthcare providers and policymakers on increasing the effectiveness of the use of antibiotics in pneumonia patients?

A: The recommendations are:

Implement a strategy to improve the use of antibiotics in pneumonia patients.
Increase awareness about antibiotic resistance among healthcare providers and patients.
Develop guidelines for the use of antibiotics in pneumonia patients.
Monitor and evaluate the use of antibiotics regularly to ensure that they are used effectively.

Q: What are the benefits of increasing the effectiveness of the use of antibiotics in pneumonia patients?

A: The benefits are:

Improved clinical outcomes for patients with pneumonia.
Reduced costs associated with the use of antibiotics.
Reduced incidence of DRPS.
Improved patient safety.

Q: What are the challenges of increasing the effectiveness of the use of antibiotics in pneumonia patients?

A: The challenges are:

Resistance to antibiotics.
Limited awareness about antibiotic resistance among healthcare providers and patients.
Limited resources for implementing a strategy to improve the use of antibiotics.
Limited data to support the effectiveness of the intervention.

Q: What are the future directions for research on increasing the effectiveness of the use of antibiotics in pneumonia patients?

A: The future directions for research are:

Conducting more studies to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention.
Developing and implementing guidelines for the use of antibiotics in pneumonia patients.
Increasing awareness about antibiotic resistance among healthcare providers and patients.
Developing and implementing strategies to improve the use of antibiotics in pneumonia patients.